Opponents' Arguments present...
Posted: Thursday, August 2, 2012 by CSULB Nursing Student Editors inMike Reynolds -- Author of the language for California's Three Strikes Law.
"Once someone has been convicted of two serious or violent offences, I suggest it's pretty clear what they are capable of. If this passes, we are likely to see property crimes going up all over the state, and in very short order"
"California saw a 37% drop in crime in the first 4 years after implementing the Three Strikes"
"If criminals are ont he street, especially repeat offenders, what are they going to be doing?"
"While all states have seen drops in crime, none have as much as in California [with Three Strikes]"
The Standford Daily News Article regarding Three Strikes Law ballot initiative
* The link above is the same article as the previous post
(Click the word balloon at the top right corner to comment)
I don't think we can give all credit to the Three Strikes Law for the drop in crime rate in Los Angeles. There are other efforts in the city by groups and individuals to lower certain crimes, such as gang violence.
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-18563_162-57469055/ex-los-angeles-gang-members-work-to-stop-violence/
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=122498235
Also, if these ex-gang members were sentenced to life in prison due to the three strikes law, would they be able to contribute their experiences from the past as gang members to prevent gang violence in Los Angeles today? I definitely believe that Three Strikes Law is too harsh. Money spent on maintain all those prisoners who are incarcerated for life for committing petty crimes should be spent on actually preventing serious issues, such as gang violence.